The Role of the Government on Tobacco Use Essay Example for Free

The Role of the Government on Tobacco Use EssayThe article, If Its Good For Philip Morris, Can It Also Be Good for existence health?, which was written by business columnist Joe Nocera and published in the New York Times, basically explores the realities concerning the government, particularly the Food and Drug Administration, and the regulation of baccy use.harmonize to the article, although tobacco company executives themselves, notably Steve Parrish, senior vice-president of Philip Morris have openly supported the regulation of tobacco use, it appears that the move lacks a concerted effort from the government. Moreover, it is also unvarnished that tobacco executives like Parrish have their personal business agendas in advocating tobacco regulation.In general, it is safe to assume that the public is more than aware well-nigh the dangers and health risks associated with tobacco smoking such as lung cancer, emphysema, and various heart diseases, among others. However, it is interesting to note that despite the various campaigns against tobacco smoking and other educational advertisements about it, there are still millions of people around the world who smoke. In fact, based on the article, in 2005, Philip Morris USA alone hauled in $4.6 billion in profits.In this regard, it is quite obvious that the governments main role is to somehow regulate tobacco use so that smokers will not jump out its deadly effects. However, this is easier said that done. According to the article, while there have been several initiatives to regulate tobacco use in the past, such as the ban on all cigarette advertisements, it seems to fall short when it comes to the actual implementation.The first plausible reason behind this is that the regulation would mean decrease in profits for tobacco companies, which in turn, would affect tobacco factory workers. And considering the global financial crisis, loss of jobs is not a logical option even though its for the win of the publi cs health.In short, while the governments duty in tobacco use is clear, it is virtually powerless to make any hale moves that would fulfill their role. The tobacco executives, on the other hand, may show that they support tobacco regulation, but their true motives are unclear. After all, they are still business community and it would not be surprising if their actions are simply meant to earn additional profits.ReferencesNocera, J. (2006). If Its Good For Philip Morris, Can It Also Be Good for Public Health? The New York Times. Retrieved April 17, 2009 from http//www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/magazine/18tobacco.html?pagewanted=3_r=1.